Structural analysis of whey representation between rural and urban populations in western Mexico.

Whey is a by-product derived from cheese making. Despite being rich in nutrients, it is little used, it even represents a problem form the environment in Mexico. In this sense, it is important to know the meanings that are associated with this term, especially when it is intended to develop new products from this by-product. The objective of this work was to analyze the representation of the term whey in rural and urban populations through the Central core Theory. Additionally, the relationship between gender-place of residence with the evoked word is explored. Therefore, three hundred and sixty people (from rural and urban areas) were interviewed face to face in two areas in the western region of Mexico. Word association test was carried out, using "whey" as stimulus; the associated words were ordered according to their importance; the polarity index of each associated word was evaluated. The most frequently mentioned words were analyzed based on their frequency of mention and average importance to identify the conceptual structure of the concept representation. The results show and influence of the place of residence on the conceptual structure. Rural participants tend to generate more words with negative connotations, while the central elements of urban consumers are mainly related to dairy products. When comparing consumers by gender, rural and urban women associate "whey" with aspects of both the production process and dairy products. In the case of men, those from the urban zone, relate to aspects related to nutrition, dairy products and nutrients. In contrast, men from the rural area relate whey mainly to negative aspects such as pollution. The study confirms that there is a link between the place of residence and the conformation of the conceptual structure, where the gender-region relationship influences the definition of the term "whey".

Validez actual de la litotricia extracorpórea como tratamiento de primera línea de la litiasis / Is extracorporeal lithotripsy a first-line treatment for urinary stones today?

Objetivo Evaluar la eficacia y complicaciones de la litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque (LEOCh) como tratamiento de primera línea de la litiasis renal y ureteral. Métodos Estudio observacional retrospectivo de todos los pacientes tratados con litotricia en un centro de tercer nivel entre enero de 2014 y enero de 2021. Se recogieron las características de los pacientes, de la litiasis, y las complicaciones y resultados de la LEOCh. Se realizó una regresión logística multivariante de los factores asociados a la reducción del tamaño litiásico. También se llevó a cabo un análisis estadístico de los factores asociados a la necesidad de tratamiento adicional tras la LEOCh y de los factores asociados a las complicaciones. Resultados Se incluyeron 1.727 pacientes. El tamaño litiásico medio fue de 9,5 mm. En 1.540 (89,4%) pacientes se observó la reducción del tamaño litiásico. En el análisis multivariante, el tamaño (OR=1,13; p=0,00), la localización de la litiasis en el uréter (OR=1,15; p=0,052) y el número de ondas (p=0,002; OR=1,00) utilizadas en la LEOCh son los factores asociados a la reducción del tamaño litiásico. Un total de 665 pacientes (38,5%) precisaron tratamiento adicional tras la litotricia. Los factores asociados a la necesidad de retratamiento fueron el tamaño litiásico (OR=1.131; p=0,000), el número de ondas (OR=1.000; p=0,000) y la energía administrada (OR=1.005; p=0,000). En 153 pacientes (8,8%) se produjeron complicaciones tras la LEOCh. Se encontró una asociación estadísticamente significativa entre el tamaño de la litiasis (p=0,024; OR=1.054) y la derivación urinaria previa (p=0,004; OR=0,571). Conclusión La litotricia sigue siendo eficaz como tratamiento de primera línea para la litiasis reno-ureteral, con un bajo porcentaje de complicaciones. (AU)

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and complications of extracorporeal lithotripsy (SWL) as a first-line treatment for renal and ureteral stones. Methods Retrospective and observational study of all the patients treated with lithotripsy in a third level center between January 2014 and January 2021; characteristics of the patients, the stones, complications and results of SWL is recollected. Multivariate logistic regression of the factors associated with stone size reduction was performed. A statistical analysis of the factors associated with additional treatment after SWL and factors associated with complications is also executed. Results 1727 patients are included. Stone mean size was 9,5 mm. 1540 (89.4%) patients presented reduction in stone size. In multivariate analysis, stone size (OR=1.13; P=0.00), ureteral location of the lithiasis (OR=1.15; P=0.052) and number of waves (P=0.002; OR=1.00) used in SWL are the factors associated with reduction of stone size. Additional treatment after lithotripsy was needed in 665 patients (38.5%). The factors associated with the need for retreatment were stone size (OR=1.131; P=0.000), number of waves (OR=1.000; P=0.000), energy (OR=1.005; P=0.000). 153 patients (8.8%) suffered complications after SWL. A statistically significant association was found between the size of the lithiasis (P=0.024, OR=1.054) and the previous urinary diversion (P=0.004, OR=0.571). Conclusion Lithotripsy remains an effective treatment as the first line of therapy for reno-ureteral lithiasis with a low percentage of complications. (AU)

Is extracorporeal lithotripsy a first-line treatment for urinary stones today?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and complications of extracorporeal lithotripsy (SWL) as a first-line treatment for renal and ureteral stones METHODS: Retrospective and observational study of all the patients treated with lithotripsy in a third level center between January 2014 and January 2021; characteristics of the patients, the stones, complications and results of SWL is recollected. Multivariate logistic regression of the factors associated with stone size reduction was performed. A statistical analysis of the factors associated with additional treatment after SWL and factors associated with complications is also executed. RESULTS: 1727 patients are included. Stone mean size was 9,5mm. 1540 (89.4%) patients presented reduction in stone size. In multivariate analysis, stone size (OR=1.13; p=0.00), ureteral location of the lithiasis (OR=1.15; p=0.052) and number of waves (p=0.002; OR=1.00) used in SWL are the factors associated with reduction of stone size. Additional treatment after lithotripsy was needed in 665 patients (38.5%). The factors associated with the need for retreatment were stone size (OR=1.131; p=0.000), number of waves (OR=1.000; p=0.000), energy (OR=1.005; p=0.000). 153 patients (8.8%) suffered complications after SWL. A statistically significant association was found between the size of the lithiasis (p=0.024, OR=1.054) and the previous urinary diversion (P=0.004, OR=0.571). CONCLUSION: Lithotripsy remains an effective treatment as the first line of therapy for reno-ureteral lithiasis with a low percentage of complications.

Litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque (LEOCh) Para litiasis de grupo calicial inferior: ¿cómo predecir el éxito del tratamiento? / Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower calyx stones: Predicting treatment success

Introducción El uso de la litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque (LEOCh) en litiasis de grupo calicial inferior (GCI) se asocia con una alta tasa de fragmentos residuales. Nuestro objetivo es analizar la efectividad y complicaciones del tratamiento con LEOCh en litiasis de GCI. Métodos Revisión retrospectiva de pacientes con litiasis en GCI tratadas con LEOCh entre enero 2014 y diciembre del 2020. Se determina anatomía favorable del GCI mediante longitud infundibular, ancho infundibular y ángulo infundibulopélvico. Se considera fracaso de LEOCh la presencia de fragmentos >3mm en radiografía simple, TC o ecografía a los 3 meses del procedimiento. Análisis de complicaciones, procedimientos auxiliares y factores de riesgo asociados con hematoma perirrenal. Análisis estadístico mediante software SPSS. Resultados En total, 512 pacientes con litiasis en GCI fueron tratados con LEOCh. El 80,3% de los pacientes tenía anatomía GCI favorable. La tasa libre de litiasis (TLL) fue 70,5%. Las principales complicaciones fueron: calle litiásica (5 pacientes) e infección del tracto urinario (3 casos). Se describen 10 hematomas perirrenales (2%). La toma de antiagregantes mostró asociación estadística con el riesgo de hematoma perirrenal (p=0,004). Mediante regresión logística binaria se demuestra asociación entre anatomía desfavorable del GCI (p=0,000), tamaño de litiasis (p=0,001), número de ondas de choque (p=0,003), energía aplicada (p=0,038) y necesidad de tratamiento adicional tras LEOCh. Conclusiones El tratamiento con LEOCh puede ser considerado de primera elección en litiasis de GCI. El tamaño de la litiasis, anatomía calicial desfavorable, número de ondas de choque y energía utilizadas pueden predecir la necesidad de retratamiento. (AU)

Introduction The use of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for lower calyx stones is associated with a high rate of residual fragments. Our aim is to analyse the effectiveness and complications of ESWL for lower calyx stones. Methods Retrospective review of patients with lower renal calyx stones treated with ESWL between January-2014 and December-2020. Measurement of infundibular length, infundibular width and infundibulopelvic angle in lower renal pole to determine favourable anatomy. ESWL failure: fragments >3mm detected in plain abdominal film, CT scan and/or renal ultrasound 3 months after treatment. Complications after ESWL, auxiliary procedures along with risk factors associated with perirenal haematoma were analysed. SPSS statistical software was used. Results 512 patients with lower calyx stones were treated with ESWL. 80.3% of patients had a favourable anatomy. Overall stone-free rate was 70.5%. Regarding main complications after ESWL, stainstrasse was described in 5 patients and urinary tract infection in 3 patients. 10 perirenal haematomas (2%) were reported. Statistical association was found between antiplatelet treatment and the risk of perirenal haematoma (p=0.004). Logistic binary regression proved the association between unfavourable anatomy of the lower renal pole (p=0.000), size of the stone (p=0.001), number of shock waves (p=0.003), energy applied (p=0.038) and the need for additional treatment after ESWL. Conclusions ESWL can still be considered as the initial treatment option for lower renal pole stones. The size of the stone, an unfavourable anatomy of the lower renal calyx, number of shock waves and energy applied can help predict the need for additional treatment. (AU)

Endometriosis: «Nivel de conocimiento y expectativas de formación específica entre profesionales especialistas en medicina de familia y comunitaria y matronas en atención primaria en la isla de Gran Canaria» / Endometriosis: “Level of knowledge and expectations of specific training among primary care doctors and midwives on the island of Gran Canaria, Spain”

Objetivo: Analizar el nivel de conocimiento entre profesionales sanitarios de atención primaria sobre endometriosis e identificar sus necesidades formativas en esta materia. Diseño: Estudio descriptivo realizado en atención primaria del Área de Salud de Gran Canaria, mediante cuestionario online anónimo. Resultados: Ciento diecinueve especialistas en medicina de familia y comunitaria y 37 matronas respondieron el cuestionario. El 54,6% de profesionales médicos y el 67,6% de matronas consideran escaso su conocimiento sobre endometriosis. Menos del 50% de profesionales conoce la guía de atención a las mujeres con endometriosis en el Sistema Nacional de Salud. Los síntomas más frecuentes relacionados con endometriosis son: dismenorrea moderada/severa, dolor pélvico crónico, esterilidad. Los menos relacionados son los digestivos y las alteraciones urinarias catameniales. Un 80% de profesionales médicos señalan como menor de 10 el número anual de pacientes en las que piensan que puedan tener endometriosis y menos de 20 para el 75% de matronas. El 40% de profesionales médicos trataría a una paciente con solo dismenorrea y sin planes de gestación con anticonceptivos orales; el 8% considera que el dolor con la menstruación es algo común. El 25% de profesionales especialistas en medicina de familia y comunitaria señalan la terapia de larga duración con antiinflamatorios no esteroideos como tratamiento de primera línea. Menos del 25% de ellos derivarían al especialista en Ginecología con solo sospechar endometriosis. Mayoritariamente los profesionales manifiestan interés en mejorar su formación en endometriosis. El 94,6% de las matronas consideran que tienen un papel estratégico en el manejo de pacientes con endometriosis. Conclusión: La demora en el diagnóstico de la endometriosis se debe en parte al desconocimiento de la enfermedad. Los profesionales de atención primaria constituyen la primera línea de atención sanitaria.(AU)

Objective: To analyze the level of knowledge of endometriosis in primary care doctors and midwives and to identify their training needs in this area. Design: Descriptive study conducted in the primary care services of the Health Area of Gran Canaria, through an anonymous online questionnaire. Results: One hundred and nineteen doctors and 37 midwives completed the questionnaire; 54.6% of doctors and 67.6% of midwives considered that their knowledge about endometriosis was poor. Less than 50% of healthcare professionals knew the National System of Health's guidelines for the management of women with endometriosis. Symptoms most frequently associated to endometriosis included: moderate/severe dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain and sterility. Less frequently related ones included: digestive symptoms and catamenial urinary disorders; 80% of doctors suspected endometriosis in <10 women per year; 75% of midwives suspected this condition in <20 women per year; 40% of doctors would prescribe oral contraceptives to patients with dysmenorrhea who were not planning pregnancy; 8% of doctors considered that menstruation-associated pain was common. Medical therapy was the most frequently chosen first-line treatment; 25% of doctors would choose long-term NSAIDs therapy as a first-line treatment; less than 25% of them would refer a patient to the Gynecology service only for suspected endometriosis. Most health professionals expressed their interest in improving their knowledge about endometriosis; 94.6% of midwives considered that they played a strategic role in the identification and management of patients with endometriosis. Conclusion: Delays in the diagnosis of endometriosis are partially due to ignorance of the disease. Primary care professionals constitute the first line of health care. In this context, it is essential to develop specific training strategies, which would be welcome by health professionals.(AU)

Transferable mechanisms of quinolone resistance are more frequent among enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolates displaying low-level quinolone resistance.

This study analysed the mechanisms of quinolone resistance among enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) in a periurban area of Lima, Peru. The susceptibility to nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin, the role of Phe-Arg-b-Naphtylamyde inhibitable-(PAbN) efflux pumps, the presence of mutations in gyrA and parC as well as the presence of aac(6')Ib-cr, qepA, qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD, qnrVC and oqxAB were determined in 31 ETEC from previous case/control studies of children's diarrhoea. Discordances between disk diffusion, with all isolates showing intermediate or fully resistance to nalidixic acid, and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), with 7 isolates being below considered resistance breakpoint, were observed. Twenty-one isolates possessed gyrA mutations (19 S83L, 2 S83A). AAC(6') Ib-cr, QnrS, QnrB and QepA were found in 7, 6, 2 and 1 isolates respectively, with 3 isolates presenting 2 transferable mechanisms of quinolone resistance (TMQR) concomitantly. TMQR were more frequent among isolates with MIC to nalidixic acid ranging from 2 to 16 mg/L (p=0.03), while gyrA mutations were more frequent among isolates with nalidixic acid MIC >= 128 mg/L (p=0.0002). In summary, the mechanisms of quinolone resistance present in ETEC isolates in Peru have been described. Differences in the prevalence of underlying mechanisms associated with final MIC levels were observed. The results suggest two different evolutive strategies to survive in the presence of quinolones related to specific bacterial genetic background.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower calyx stones: predicting treatment success.

INTRODUCTION: The use of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for lower calyx stones is associated with a high rate of residual fragments. Our aim is to analyse the effectiveness and complications of ESWL for lower calyx stones. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with lower renal calyx stones treated with ESWL between January-2014 and December-2020. Measurement of infundibular length, infundibular width and infundibulopelvic angle in lower renal pole to determine favourable anatomy. ESWL failure: fragments >3 mm detected in plain abdominal film, CT scan and/or renal ultrasound 3 months after treatment. Complications after ESWL, auxiliary procedures along with risk factors associated with perirenal haematoma were analysed. SPSS statistical software was used. RESULTS: 512 patients with lower calyx stones were treated with ESWL. 80.3% of patients had a favourable anatomy. Overall stone-free rate was 70.5%. Regarding main complications after ESWL, stainstrasse was described in 5 patients and urinary tract infection in 3 patients. 10 perirenal haematomas (2%) were reported. Statistical association was found between antiplatelet treatment and the risk of perirenal haematoma (p = 0.004). Logistic binary regression proved the association between unfavourable anatomy of the lower renal pole (p = 0.000), size of the stone (p = 0.001), number of shock waves (p = 0.003), energy applied (p = 0.038) and the need for additional treatment after ESWL. CONCLUSIONS: ESWL can still be considered as the initial treatment option for lower renal pole stones. The size of the stone, an unfavourable anatomy of the lower renal calyx, number of shock waves and energy applied can help predict the need for additional treatment.

The costs of surgical site infection after abdominal surgery in middle-income countries: Key resource use In Wound Infection (KIWI) study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common complication of abdominal surgery, with substantial costs to patients and health systems. Heterogeneity in costing methods in existing SSI studies makes multi-country comparison challenging. The objective of the study was to assess the costs of SSI across middle-income countries. METHODS: Centres from a randomized controlled trial assessing interventions to reduce SSI (FALCON, ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03700749NCT) were sampled from two upper-middle- (India, Mexico) and two lower-middle- (Ghana, Nigeria) income countries. The Key resource use In Wound Infection (KIWI) study collected data on postoperative resource use and costs from consecutive patients undergoing abdominal surgery with an incision >5 cm (including caesarean section) that were recruited to FALCON between April and October 2020. The overall costs faced by patients with and without SSI were compared by operative field contamination (clean-contaminated vs contaminated-dirty), country and timing (inpatient vs outpatient). FINDINGS: A total of 335 patients were included in KIWI; SSI occurred in 7% of clean-contaminated cases and 27% of contaminated-dirty cases. Overall, SSI was associated with an increase in postoperative healthcare costs by 75.3% (€412 international Euros) after clean-contaminated surgery and 66.6% (€331) after contaminated-dirty surgery. The highest and lowest cost increases were in India for clean-contaminated cases (€517) and contaminated-dirty cases (€223), respectively. Overall, inpatient costs accounted for 96.4% of the total healthcare costs after clean-contaminated surgery and 92.5% after contaminated-dirty surgery. CONCLUSION: SSI was associated with substantial additional postoperative costs across a range of settings. Investment in health technologies to reduce SSI may mitigate the financial burden to patients and low-resource health systems.

Lecciones aprendidas sobre el manejo de la urolitiasis tras los perjuicios causados por la COVID-19: un ejemplo de adaptación en un centro de alto volumen / Lessons learned after the disruption caused by COVID-19 in the management of urolithiasis: An example of adaptation in a high-volume center

Introducción El objetivo del estudio fue analizar el impacto de la pandemia por COVID-19 en la presentación y el manejo de la enfermedad litiásica. Métodos Estudio retrospectivo comparativo de los procedimientos (urgentes y electivos) por litiasis durante los primeros 8 meses de la pandemia (01/03/2020 al 31/10/2020), comparándose con el mismo periodo de 2019, y entre olas. Las pruebas utilizadas fueron la prueba exacta de Fisher, la t de Student, la chi-cuadrado y la U de Mann-Whitney. Resultados Se analizaron 530 procedimientos. El número total de procedimientos quirúrgicos por enfermedad litiásica fue similar entre los 2 periodos. En cuanto a la cirugía electiva, se identificó un aumento en la tasa de complicaciones en el periodo de pandemia, pero no se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en cuanto a tipos de procedimientos realizados y necesidad de tratamientos complementarios. El patrón de presentación del cólico renoureteral complicado fue diferente durante la pandemia, con un mayor número de días desde el inicio de los síntomas hasta la consulta y una mayor proporción de pacientes con fracaso renal agudo. Asimismo, se detectó un aumento significativo de los niveles de creatinina en la primera ola, así como un incremento en el número de procedimientos urgentes tras la primera ola debido al retraso en el tratamiento y diagnóstico de la enfermedad litiásica. Conclusiones La pandemia por COVID-19 ha impactado negativamente en el tratamiento urgente y electivo de la litiasis. Se deben aprender lecciones sobre el manejo de la litiasis en este contexto para evitar complicaciones graves y mejorar los estándares de atención (AU)

Introduction The aim was to determine the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on urolithiasis presentation and management. Methods In this retrospective study, we comparatively evaluated urgent and elective procedures due to urolithiasis during the early 8 months of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 1, 2020, to October 31, 2020) compared to the same period a year before, and between waves. Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the patients’ characteristics and outcomes between the 2 periods and waves. Results Five hundred and thirty procedures were included. The overall numbers of surgical procedures due to urolithiasis were similar between pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Regarding elective surgery, our data draw attention to the increased complication rate in the pandemic times, but no statistically significant differences in terms of types of procedures and need for complementary treatments were observed. We noted that patterns of presentation of complicated renal colic were different during COVID-19 pandemic, with a higher number of days after the onset of symptoms and a higher proportion of patients presenting acute kidney injury. Furthermore, a significant increase of creatinine levels at presentation in first wave was detected, and a growth in the number of urgent procedures after the first wave was noted, owing to the delay in urolithiasis treatment and diagnosis. Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected both urgent and elective management of urolithiasis. Lessons about the management of urolithiasis in this context should be learned to avoid fatal complications and improve standards of care (AU)

Born into an isolating world: family-centred care for babies born to mothers with COVID-19.

Background: The benefits of facilitating breastmilk feeding and close contact between mother and neonate (family-centred care; FCC) in the perinatal period are well-established. The aim of this study was to determine how the delivery of FCC practices were impacted for neonates born to mothers with perinatal SARS-CoV-2 infection during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Neonates born to mothers with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy were identified from the 'EsPnIC Covid paEdiatric NeonaTal REgistry' (EPICENTRE) multinational cohort between 10 March 2020 and 20 October 2021. The EPICENTRE cohort collected prospective data on FCC practices. Rooming-in and breastmilk feeding practice were the main outcomes, and factors influencing each were determined. Other outcomes included mother-baby physical contact prior to separation and the pattern of FCC components relative to time and local site guidelines. Findings: 692 mother-baby dyads (13 sites, 10 countries) were analysed. 27 (5%) neonates were positive for SARS-CoV-2 (14 (52%) asymptomatic). Most sites had policies that encouraged FCC during perinatal SARS-CoV-2 infection for most of the reporting period. 311 (46%) neonates roomed-in with their mother during the admission. Rooming-in increased over time from 23% in March-June 2020 to 74% in January-March 2021 (boreal season). 330 (93%) of the 369 separated neonates had no FCC physical contact with their mother prior, and 319 (86%) were asymptomatic. Maternal breastmilk was used for feeding in 354 (53%) neonates, increasing from 23% to 70% between March-June 2020 and January-March 2021. FCC was most impacted when mothers had symptomatic COVID-19 at birth. Interpretation: This is the largest report of global FCC practice during the COVID-19 pandemic to date. The COVID-19 pandemic may have impacted FCC despite low perinatal transmission rates. Fortunately, clinicians appear to have adapted to allow more FCC delivery as the COVID-19 pandemic progressed. Funding: The National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia): Grant ID 2008212 (DGT), Royal Children's Hospital Foundation: Grant ID 2019-1155 (EJP), Victorian Government Operational Infrastructure Support Program.

Lessons learned after the disruption caused by COVID-19 in the management of urolithiasis: An example of adaptation in a high-volume center.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to determine the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on urolithiasis presentation and management. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we comparatively evaluated urgent and elective procedures due to urolithiasis during the early eight months of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 1, 2020, to October 31, 2020) compared to the same period a year before, and between waves. The student's t-test, chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare the patients' characteristics and outcomes between the two periods and waves. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty procedures were included. The overall numbers of surgical procedures due to urolithiasis were similar between pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Regarding elective surgery, our data draw attention to the increased complication rate in the pandemic times, but no statistically significant differences in terms of types of procedures and need for complementary treatments were observed. We noted that patterns of presentation of complicated renal colic were different during COVID-19 pandemic, with a higher number of days after the onset of symptoms and a higher proportion of patients presenting acute kidney injury. Furthermore, a significant increase of creatinine levels at presentation in first wave was detected, and a growth in the number of urgent procedures after the first wave was noted, owing to the delay in urolithiasis treatment and diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected both urgent and elective management of urolithiasis. Lessons about the management of urolithiasis in this context should be learned to avoid fatal complications and improve standards of care.

[Lessons learned after the disruption caused by COVID-19 in the management of urolithiasis: An example of adaptation in a high-volume center]. / Lecciones aprendidas sobre el manejo de la urolitiasis tras los perjuicios causados por la COVID-19: un ejemplo de adaptación en un centro de alto volumen.

Introduction: The aim was to determine the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on urolithiasis presentation and management. Methods: In this retrospective study, we comparatively evaluated urgent and elective procedures due to urolithiasis during the early 8 months of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 1, 2020, to October 31, 2020) compared to the same period a year before, and between waves. Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the patients' characteristics and outcomes between the 2 periods and waves. Results: Five hundred and thirty procedures were included. The overall numbers of surgical procedures due to urolithiasis were similar between pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Regarding elective surgery, our data draw attention to the increased complication rate in the pandemic times, but no statistically significant differences in terms of types of procedures and need for complementary treatments were observed. We noted that patterns of presentation of complicated renal colic were different during COVID-19 pandemic, with a higher number of days after the onset of symptoms and a higher proportion of patients presenting acute kidney injury. Furthermore, a significant increase of creatinine levels at presentation in first wave was detected, and a growth in the number of urgent procedures after the first wave was noted, owing to the delay in urolithiasis treatment and diagnosis. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected both urgent and elective management of urolithiasis. Lessons about the management of urolithiasis in this context should be learned to avoid fatal complications and improve standards of care.

SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF THYMIC PEPTIDES IN THE TREATMENT OF HOSPITALIZED COVID-19 PATIENTS IN HONDURAS.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) active cases continue to demand the development of safe and effective treatments. This is the first clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral thymic peptides. ; We conducted a nonrandomized phase 2 trial with a historic control group to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a daily 250-mg oral dose of thymic peptides in the treatment of hospitalized Covid-19 patients. Comparisons based on standard care from registry data were performed after propensity score matching. The primary outcomes were survival, time to recovery, and number of participants with treatment-related adverse events or side effects by day 20. ; A total of 44 patients were analyzed in this study: 22 in the thymic peptide group and 22 in the standard care group. There were no deaths in the intervention group compared to 24% mortality in standard care by day 20 (log-rank P=0.02). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly shorter time to recovery by day 20 in the thymic peptide group than in the standard care group (median, 6 days vs. 12 days; hazard ratio for recovery, 2.75 [95% confidence interval, 1.34 to 5.62]; log-rank P=0.002). No side effects or adverse events were reported. ; In patients hospitalized with Covid-19, the use of thymic peptides resulted in no side effects, adverse events, or deaths by day 20. Compared with the registry data, a significantly shorter time to recovery and mortality reduction were measured.

[Features of patients admitted with COVID-19 to a Chilean regional hospital during the first stages of the pandemic]. / COVID-19 en adultos en el Hospital de Puerto Montt en la primera etapa de la pandemia.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic posed a great strain in health services. AIM: To describe the epidemiological and clinical features of patients with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to a regional hospital in southern Chile between April and August 2020. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Clinical records of all hospitalized patients with RT-PCR (+) for SARS-CoV-2 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: During the study period 226 patients aged 55 ± 18 years (55% men) were admitted. The main comorbidities were high blood pressure in 45%, diabetes in 31% and obesity in 21%. The main symptoms were dyspnea in 70%, cough in 69%, fever in 62% and myalgia in 47%. Pneumonia was the main cause of admission in 66%. Images on admission were compatible with pneumonia in 81%, and with a typical COVID-19 pattern in 84%. In 76% there was five-lobe involvement. Eighty-seven cases (39%) were admitted to critical care, with an APACHE score of 10.9 ± 7.1. Invasive mechanical ventilation was used in 16%, 30% required prone position and 13%, a high-flow nasal cannula. The mean stay in critical care was 13.3 days. The mean duration of invasive mechanical ventilation was 14.1 days. Antimicrobials were used in 55% and dexamethasone in 36%. Twenty-two (9.7%) patients aged 71.7 ± 14 died. A Charlson comorbidity index > 3, heart failure and connection to invasive mechanical ventilation were independent risk factors for death. An age > 65 years alone and other comorbidities were not risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Viral pneumonia is the main cause of hospitalization for COVID-19, usually extensive and bilateral. The greater severity and poor prognosis of these patients are mainly related to comorbidities.